[Merged by Bors] - Accept Bundles for insert and remove. Deprecate insert/remove_bundle by cart · Pull Request #6039 · bevyengine/bevy

cart · 2022-09-20T22:06:14Z

Objective

Take advantage of the "impl Bundle for Component" changes in #2975 / add the follow up changes discussed there.

Solution

Change insert and remove to accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World)
Deprecate insert_bundle, remove_bundle, and remove_bundle_intersection
Add remove_intersection

Changelog

Change insert and remove now accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World)
insert_bundle and remove_bundle are deprecated

Migration Guide

Replace insert_bundle with insert:

// Old (0.8)
commands.spawn().insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default());
// New (0.9)
commands.spawn().insert(SomeBundle::default());

Replace remove_bundle with remove:

// Old (0.8)
commands.entity(some_entity).remove_bundle::<SomeBundle>();
// New (0.9)
commands.entity(some_entity).remove::<SomeBundle>();

Replace remove_bundle_intersection with remove_intersection:

// Old (0.8)
world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_bundle_intersection::<SomeBundle>();
// New (0.9)
world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_intersection::<SomeBundle>();

Consider consolidating as many operations as possible to improve ergonomics and cut down on archetype moves:

// Old (0.8)
commands.spawn()
  .insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default())
  .insert(SomeComponent);

// New (0.9) - Option 1
commands.spawn().insert((
  SomeBundle::default(),
  SomeComponent,
))

// New (0.9) - Option 2
commands.spawn_bundle((
  SomeBundle::default(),
  SomeComponent,
))

Next Steps

Consider changing spawn to accept a bundle and deprecate spawn_bundle.

alice-i-cecile · 2022-09-20T22:13:33Z

Perhaps out of scope, but I would like to see:

remove_intersection on Commands as well.
remove_intersection renamed to remove_if_able to reduce jargon (and enable consistency with a future despawn_if_able operation).

…ove_bundle

cart · 2022-09-20T22:15:42Z

Yeah I think I'd prefer to handle those in a followup. Note that Commands::remove is already remove_intersection internally. We made that call awhile back to make it work gracefully with multiple queued up remove commands.

hymm · 2022-09-20T22:16:13Z

should all the instances of .spawn().insert() be replaced by .spawn_bundle()?

alice-i-cecile · 2022-09-20T22:19:20Z

should all the instances of .spawn().insert() be replaced by .spawn_bundle()?

IMO yes, but in a follow-up.

cart · 2022-09-20T22:22:14Z

should all the instances of .spawn().insert() be replaced by .spawn_bundle()?

I've already done this for most instances of commands.spawn().insert(). There are only a few stragglers. I'll do that in this pr. But we can't do that for World yet because there is no spawn_bundle on World. This will be done in the followup when we deprecate spawn_bundle and replace it with spawn(some_bundle) (both on World and Commands).

crates/bevy_transform/src/systems.rs

examples/games/contributors.rs

Co-authored-by: Mike <[email protected]>

cart · 2022-09-21T21:47:34Z

bors r+

…6039) # Objective Take advantage of the "impl Bundle for Component" changes in #2975 / add the follow up changes discussed there. ## Solution - Change `insert` and `remove` to accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - Deprecate `insert_bundle`, `remove_bundle`, and `remove_bundle_intersection` - Add `remove_intersection` --- ## Changelog - Change `insert` and `remove` now accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - `insert_bundle` and `remove_bundle` are deprecated ## Migration Guide Replace `insert_bundle` with `insert`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn().insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()); // New (0.9) commands.spawn().insert(SomeBundle::default()); ``` Replace `remove_bundle` with `remove`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.entity(some_entity).remove_bundle::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) commands.entity(some_entity).remove::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Replace `remove_bundle_intersection` with `remove_intersection`: ```rust // Old (0.8) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_bundle_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Consider consolidating as many operations as possible to improve ergonomics and cut down on archetype moves: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn() .insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()) .insert(SomeComponent); // New (0.9) - Option 1 commands.spawn().insert(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) // New (0.9) - Option 2 commands.spawn_bundle(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) ``` ## Next Steps Consider changing `spawn` to accept a bundle and deprecate `spawn_bundle`.

bors · 2022-09-21T22:05:43Z

Pull request successfully merged into main.

Build succeeded:

# Objective Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to #2975 and #6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands). ## Solution All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input: ```rust // before: commands .spawn() .insert((A, B, C)); world .spawn() .insert((A, B, C); // after commands.spawn((A, B, C)); world.spawn((A, B, C)); ``` All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api. By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`). This improves spawn performance by over 10%: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/191627587-4ab2f949-4ccd-4231-80eb-80dd4d9ad6b9.png) To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark. Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main. **Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).** --- ## Changelog - All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input - All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api - World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior. ## Migration Guide ```rust // Old (0.8): commands .spawn() .insert_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): let entity = commands.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id(); // Old (0.8) let entity = world.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = world.spawn_empty(); ```

…evyengine#6039) # Objective Take advantage of the "impl Bundle for Component" changes in bevyengine#2975 / add the follow up changes discussed there. ## Solution - Change `insert` and `remove` to accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - Deprecate `insert_bundle`, `remove_bundle`, and `remove_bundle_intersection` - Add `remove_intersection` --- ## Changelog - Change `insert` and `remove` now accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - `insert_bundle` and `remove_bundle` are deprecated ## Migration Guide Replace `insert_bundle` with `insert`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn().insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()); // New (0.9) commands.spawn().insert(SomeBundle::default()); ``` Replace `remove_bundle` with `remove`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.entity(some_entity).remove_bundle::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) commands.entity(some_entity).remove::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Replace `remove_bundle_intersection` with `remove_intersection`: ```rust // Old (0.8) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_bundle_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Consider consolidating as many operations as possible to improve ergonomics and cut down on archetype moves: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn() .insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()) .insert(SomeComponent); // New (0.9) - Option 1 commands.spawn().insert(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) // New (0.9) - Option 2 commands.spawn_bundle(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) ``` ## Next Steps Consider changing `spawn` to accept a bundle and deprecate `spawn_bundle`.

# Objective Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to bevyengine#2975 and bevyengine#6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands). ## Solution All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input: ```rust // before: commands .spawn() .insert((A, B, C)); world .spawn() .insert((A, B, C); // after commands.spawn((A, B, C)); world.spawn((A, B, C)); ``` All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api. By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`). This improves spawn performance by over 10%: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/191627587-4ab2f949-4ccd-4231-80eb-80dd4d9ad6b9.png) To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark. Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main. **Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).** --- ## Changelog - All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input - All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api - World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior. ## Migration Guide ```rust // Old (0.8): commands .spawn() .insert_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): let entity = commands.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id(); // Old (0.8) let entity = world.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = world.spawn_empty(); ```

…evyengine#6039) # Objective Take advantage of the "impl Bundle for Component" changes in bevyengine#2975 / add the follow up changes discussed there. ## Solution - Change `insert` and `remove` to accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - Deprecate `insert_bundle`, `remove_bundle`, and `remove_bundle_intersection` - Add `remove_intersection` --- ## Changelog - Change `insert` and `remove` now accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - `insert_bundle` and `remove_bundle` are deprecated ## Migration Guide Replace `insert_bundle` with `insert`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn().insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()); // New (0.9) commands.spawn().insert(SomeBundle::default()); ``` Replace `remove_bundle` with `remove`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.entity(some_entity).remove_bundle::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) commands.entity(some_entity).remove::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Replace `remove_bundle_intersection` with `remove_intersection`: ```rust // Old (0.8) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_bundle_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Consider consolidating as many operations as possible to improve ergonomics and cut down on archetype moves: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn() .insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()) .insert(SomeComponent); // New (0.9) - Option 1 commands.spawn().insert(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) // New (0.9) - Option 2 commands.spawn_bundle(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) ``` ## Next Steps Consider changing `spawn` to accept a bundle and deprecate `spawn_bundle`.

# Objective Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to bevyengine#2975 and bevyengine#6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands). ## Solution All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input: ```rust // before: commands .spawn() .insert((A, B, C)); world .spawn() .insert((A, B, C); // after commands.spawn((A, B, C)); world.spawn((A, B, C)); ``` All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api. By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`). This improves spawn performance by over 10%: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/191627587-4ab2f949-4ccd-4231-80eb-80dd4d9ad6b9.png) To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark. Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main. **Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).** --- ## Changelog - All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input - All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api - World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior. ## Migration Guide ```rust // Old (0.8): commands .spawn() .insert_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): let entity = commands.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id(); // Old (0.8) let entity = world.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = world.spawn_empty(); ```

…evyengine#6039) # Objective Take advantage of the "impl Bundle for Component" changes in bevyengine#2975 / add the follow up changes discussed there. ## Solution - Change `insert` and `remove` to accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - Deprecate `insert_bundle`, `remove_bundle`, and `remove_bundle_intersection` - Add `remove_intersection` --- ## Changelog - Change `insert` and `remove` now accept a Bundle instead of a Component (for both Commands and World) - `insert_bundle` and `remove_bundle` are deprecated ## Migration Guide Replace `insert_bundle` with `insert`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn().insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()); // New (0.9) commands.spawn().insert(SomeBundle::default()); ``` Replace `remove_bundle` with `remove`: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.entity(some_entity).remove_bundle::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) commands.entity(some_entity).remove::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Replace `remove_bundle_intersection` with `remove_intersection`: ```rust // Old (0.8) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_bundle_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); // New (0.9) world.entity_mut(some_entity).remove_intersection::<SomeBundle>(); ``` Consider consolidating as many operations as possible to improve ergonomics and cut down on archetype moves: ```rust // Old (0.8) commands.spawn() .insert_bundle(SomeBundle::default()) .insert(SomeComponent); // New (0.9) - Option 1 commands.spawn().insert(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) // New (0.9) - Option 2 commands.spawn_bundle(( SomeBundle::default(), SomeComponent, )) ``` ## Next Steps Consider changing `spawn` to accept a bundle and deprecate `spawn_bundle`.

# Objective Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to bevyengine#2975 and bevyengine#6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands). ## Solution All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input: ```rust // before: commands .spawn() .insert((A, B, C)); world .spawn() .insert((A, B, C); // after commands.spawn((A, B, C)); world.spawn((A, B, C)); ``` All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api. By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`). This improves spawn performance by over 10%: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/191627587-4ab2f949-4ccd-4231-80eb-80dd4d9ad6b9.png) To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark. Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main. **Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).** --- ## Changelog - All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input - All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api - World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior. ## Migration Guide ```rust // Old (0.8): commands .spawn() .insert_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): let entity = commands.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id(); // Old (0.8) let entity = world.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = world.spawn_empty(); ```

cart added A-ECS Entities, components, systems, and events C-Usability A targeted quality-of-life change that makes Bevy easier to use M-Migration-Guide A breaking change to Bevy's public API that needs to be noted in a migration guide labels Sep 20, 2022

alice-i-cecile added this to the Bevy 0.9 milestone Sep 20, 2022

Accept Bundles for insert and remove. Deprecate insert_bundle and rem…

5d4a725

…ove_bundle

cart force-pushed the new-insert-remove branch from 5387917 to 5d4a725 Compare September 20, 2022 22:13

Replace straggling spawn().insert()s with spawn_bundle()

b525fc1

hymm approved these changes Sep 21, 2022

View reviewed changes

crates/bevy_transform/src/systems.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

examples/games/contributors.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

cart and others added 3 commits September 21, 2022 12:26

Update crates/bevy_transform/src/systems.rs

2ed410d

Co-authored-by: Mike <[email protected]>

replace remaining commands.spawn().insert()s with spawn_bundle()

209f97f

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into new-insert-remove

ac5365a

alice-i-cecile approved these changes Sep 21, 2022

View reviewed changes

tim-blackbird approved these changes Sep 21, 2022

View reviewed changes

alice-i-cecile added the S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it label Sep 21, 2022

bors bot changed the title ~~Accept Bundles for insert and remove. Deprecate insert/remove_bundle~~ [Merged by Bors] - Accept Bundles for insert and remove. Deprecate insert/remove_bundle Sep 21, 2022

bors bot closed this Sep 21, 2022

cart mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2022

[Merged by Bors] - Spawn now takes a Bundle #6054

Closed

james7132 mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2022

Enforce type-uniqueness of Bundles #2387

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

[Merged by Bors] - Accept Bundles for insert and remove. Deprecate insert/remove_bundle#6039

[Merged by Bors] - Accept Bundles for insert and remove. Deprecate insert/remove_bundle#6039
cart wants to merge 5 commits intobevyengine:mainfrom
cart:new-insert-remove

cart commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

alice-i-cecile commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

cart commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

hymm commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

alice-i-cecile commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

cart commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cart commented Sep 21, 2022

Uh oh!

bors bot commented Sep 21, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

cart commented Sep 20, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Objective

Solution

Changelog

Migration Guide

Next Steps

Uh oh!

alice-i-cecile commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

cart commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

hymm commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

alice-i-cecile commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

cart commented Sep 20, 2022

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cart commented Sep 21, 2022

Uh oh!

bors bot commented Sep 21, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

cart commented Sep 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading