Improve ci#6
Conversation
mguid65
commented
May 3, 2024
- Modify CI to use default images from github
- Add windows, linux, and macos
- Note:
- For Ninja, we have to fetch it from an external source
- For Windows, we have to do some work to setup the msvc dev environment
- For both of the above, these are accomplished by using public actions from the marketplace
- This may not be appropriate and so we may have to do something different
| on: | ||
| push: | ||
| branches: [ main ] | ||
| paths: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you intend to merge this change.
|
Is there any update to this pr? @neatudarius @camio @bbrown105 |
|
I apologize, the reason for the lack of updates is that I forgot I made this PR. We can either continue with proposed changes to this or we can discard it. |
neatudarius
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mguid65 , would you like to update your branch with latest main before continue with this review? Some changes are not applicable anymore.
e.g. Due to one usage examples, now the project requires C++20 or later.
Would you like to try to re-enable this example on your updated branch https://github.com/beman-project/exemplar/blob/main/examples/CMakeLists.txt#L4?
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
| @@ -1,83 +1,97 @@ | |||
| # Copyright © 2024 Bret Brown | |||
| # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why do you want to remove these lines? I think we should keep them.
btw, @camio , should we add a mention for YAML files into https://github.com/beman-project/beman/blob/main/docs/beman-standard.md#file-contents?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
btw, @camio , should we add a mention for YAML files into https://github.com/beman-project/beman/blob/main/docs/beman-standard.md#file-contents?
Sounds like a promising idea. Would you be willing to create a PR or issue for it?
I think this PR is abandoned, see: #27 (comment), and the comment above. I can fork this PR and pick this up. |
|
As per previous reply, I closed this PR to avoid more confusion, we can fork it later. |