Skip to content

VERIFY_INTERFACE_HEADER_SETS only if PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL#303

Merged
ednolan merged 1 commit intobemanproject:mainfrom
ClausKlein:feature/VERIFY_INTERFACE_HEADER_SETS-if-PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL
Mar 14, 2026
Merged

VERIFY_INTERFACE_HEADER_SETS only if PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL#303
ednolan merged 1 commit intobemanproject:mainfrom
ClausKlein:feature/VERIFY_INTERFACE_HEADER_SETS-if-PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL

Conversation

@ClausKlein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ClausKlein ClausKlein commented Feb 23, 2026

see targets list of ninja help on beman.net project:

beman.execution: phony
beman.execution_headers: phony
beman.execution_headers_verify_interface_header_sets: phony
beman.net_headers: phony
beman.net_headers_verify_interface_header_sets: phony
beman.task: phony
beman.task_headers: phony
beman.task_headers_verify_interface_header_sets: phony
libbeman.execution.a: phony
libbeman.task.a: phony
sorted_list.pass: phony

see https://discourse.bemanproject.org/t/the-verify-interface-header-sets-must-not-always-enabled/560

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Feb 23, 2026

Coverage Status

coverage: 100.0%. remained the same
when pulling 7531ed9 on ClausKlein:feature/VERIFY_INTERFACE_HEADER_SETS-if-PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL
into 89266c7 on bemanproject:main.

@steve-downey
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Do we exclude the verification from the alltarget?

@ClausKlein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Do we exclude the verification from the alltarget?

It was always an independent target

@ednolan ednolan force-pushed the feature/VERIFY_INTERFACE_HEADER_SETS-if-PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL branch from d180110 to 7531ed9 Compare March 14, 2026 21:28
@ednolan ednolan merged commit 3e83bfa into bemanproject:main Mar 14, 2026
89 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants