Skip to content

Revert complications voided by #142#160

Merged
wusatosi merged 2 commits intobemanproject:mainfrom
wusatosi:revert-preset-ci
May 5, 2025
Merged

Revert complications voided by #142#160
wusatosi merged 2 commits intobemanproject:mainfrom
wusatosi:revert-preset-ci

Conversation

@wusatosi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@wusatosi wusatosi commented Apr 29, 2025

Description

Revert CI changes introduced in #105, this is possible because we have fix preset regression in #142 .

Related Issues

See also: #141

Motivation and Context

Simplify CI.

Testing

CI passing.

Meta

  • If all approvals are obtained and the PR is green, any Beman member can merge the PR.

@wusatosi wusatosi merged commit ae7eb8d into bemanproject:main May 5, 2025
67 checks passed
run: |
sudo add-apt-repository universe
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y libgtest-dev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be a drive-by fix related to the fact that the ci images now contain libgtest-dev; this is a nitpick, but I think this line should have been in a separate pull request.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line is introduced by #105 to support default find package workflow.
#142 essentially set back default workflow to fetch content again.
I see your perspective, we should re-evaluate this later. I don't know if we want to put libgtest-dev in the testing environment without explicitly installing it in a separate step.

Thanks for double checking!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh okay, I didn't understand that. Disregard my comment, in that case

@wusatosi wusatosi deleted the revert-preset-ci branch May 6, 2025 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants