Merged
Conversation
meisterT
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2021
|
Is this syntax compatible with Bazel? I take it that here Type annotation can be parsed, but is not strongly enforced/checked right? |
Member
Author
|
Correct, Bazel currently doesn't support type annotations, and Buildifier doesn't enforce them in any way, this is just for compatibility with other Starlark dialects that use Python3-like type annotations. |
apattidb
pushed a commit
to databricks/buildtools
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The commit allows using Python3-like type annotations for function parameters and return values:
Fixes #900