Skip to content

Conversation

@rjobredeaux3
Copy link
Contributor

@rjobredeaux3 rjobredeaux3 commented Dec 13, 2022

I'm in the process of updating the version of android_common, which hasn't been done in 6 years. The code under aosp_gradle_core depends on android_common and needs updating in preparation for this. This PR updates the code under aosp_gradle_core to be compatible with version 30.1.3. Since the transition to the new version cannot be atomically done with this change, I've made a copy of the file, on which I've made the required changes.

@sgowroji sgowroji added team-Android Issues for Android team awaiting-review PR is awaiting review from an assigned reviewer labels Dec 14, 2022
@meteorcloudy
Copy link
Member

One downside of checking in those jars is that it will forever increase the size of Bazel repository by 7-8 MB, are those jars going to end up in the embedded bazel tools? That would also cause the Bazel binary size to increase.

As an alternative, have you considered using rules_jvm_external to fetch those jars instead?

@meteorcloudy
Copy link
Member

@rjobredeaux3 Can you also update the PR description, thanks!

@rjobredeaux3 rjobredeaux3 changed the title Import manifest merger version 30.1.3 Update aosp_gradle_core in preparation for updating manifest merger to version 30.1.3 Jan 3, 2023
@rjobredeaux3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Following Yun's suggestion I have removed the jars from the PR and left it with just the update to aosp_gradle_core. We'll use the work in #17112 to provide the jars via a maven import rule instead

@rjobredeaux3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Erm, this can only work once #17112 is submitted and the top-level WORKSPACE file is updated to contain the required android_common dependency

@rjobredeaux3
Copy link
Contributor Author

@meteorcloudy Neither Alex nor I have permission to merge this, can you help with next steps?

@meteorcloudy
Copy link
Member

meteorcloudy commented Jan 16, 2023

The gTech team will help us merge third_party change as well, just add the awaiting-PR-merge label. /cc @sgowroji

@rjobredeaux3 Can you squash all the commits into one so that it's easier to merge?

@meteorcloudy meteorcloudy added awaiting-PR-merge PR has been approved by a reviewer and is ready to be merge internally and removed awaiting-review PR is awaiting review from an assigned reviewer labels Jan 16, 2023
@rjobredeaux3
Copy link
Contributor Author

The gTech team will help us merge third_party change as well, just add the awaiting-PR-merge label. /cc @sgowroji

@rjobredeaux3 Can you squash all the commits into one so that it's easier to merge?

Done.

copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2023
…o version 30.1.3.

Partial commit for third_party/*, see #17014.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Gowroji <[email protected]>
@sgowroji
Copy link
Member

Merged at 2751985

@sgowroji sgowroji closed this Jan 17, 2023
@sgowroji sgowroji removed the awaiting-PR-merge PR has been approved by a reviewer and is ready to be merge internally label Jan 17, 2023
hvadehra pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2023
…o version 30.1.3.

Partial commit for third_party/*, see #17014.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Gowroji <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

team-Android Issues for Android team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants