Description of the bug:
When building Bazel itself with a local JDK21 (local_java_runtime), it fails with following error:
ERROR: /usr/local/google/home/chiwang/.cache/bazel/_bazel_chiwang/0d7b80a634c8f6dac7c916ddfc337473/external/rules_jvm_external~6.0/private/tools/java/com/github/bazelbuild/rules_jvm_external/BUILD:1:13: Compiling Java headers external/rules_jvm_external~6.0/private/tools/java/com/github/bazelbuild/rules_jvm_external/librules_jvm_external-hjar.jar (4 source files) [for tool] failed: (Exit 1): turbine_direct_graal failed: error executing Turbine command (from target @@rules_jvm_external~6.0//private/tools/java/com/github/bazelbuild/rules_jvm_external:rules_jvm_external) external/rules_java~7.4.0~toolchains~remote_java_tools_linux/java_tools/turbine_direct_graal --output ... (remaining 33 arguments skipped)
Use --sandbox_debug to see verbose messages from the sandbox and retain the sandbox build root for debugging
java.lang.NullPointerException: attempted to use --release, but JAVA_HOME is not set
at [email protected]/java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:259)
at com.google.turbine.binder.CtSymClassBinder.bind(CtSymClassBinder.java:55)
at com.google.turbine.main.Main.bootclasspath(Main.java:309)
at com.google.turbine.main.Main.compile(Main.java:142)
at com.google.turbine.main.Main.compile(Main.java:133)
at com.google.turbine.main.Main.main(Main.java:89)
Target //src:bazel failed to build
It seems like the turbine.ctSymPath property isn't correctly set, because java_runtime.lib_ct_sym is None. By following the code in _java_runtime_rule_impl, it's because local_java_runtime doesn't set srcs nor lib_ct_sym .
This prevent us using RBE with JDK21.
Which category does this issue belong to?
Java Rules
What's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.
- Clone
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel
- Add a local JDK runtime into
BUILD:
load("@rules_java//toolchains:local_java_repository.bzl", "local_java_runtime")
local_java_runtime(
name = "local",
java_home = "<path to local JDK21>",
version = "21",
)
bazel build --java_runtime_version=local --tool_java_runtime_version=local --extra_toolchains=//:all //src:bazel
Which operating system are you running Bazel on?
linux
What is the output of bazel info release?
release 7.0.2
If bazel info release returns development version or (@non-git), tell us how you built Bazel.
No response
What's the output of git remote get-url origin; git rev-parse HEAD ?
No response
Is this a regression? If yes, please try to identify the Bazel commit where the bug was introduced.
No response
Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?
No response
Any other information, logs, or outputs that you want to share?
No response
Description of the bug:
When building Bazel itself with a local JDK21 (
local_java_runtime), it fails with following error:It seems like the
turbine.ctSymPathproperty isn't correctly set, becausejava_runtime.lib_ct_symisNone. By following the code in_java_runtime_rule_impl, it's becauselocal_java_runtimedoesn't setsrcsnorlib_ct_sym.This prevent us using RBE with JDK21.
Which category does this issue belong to?
Java Rules
What's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazelBUILD:bazel build --java_runtime_version=local --tool_java_runtime_version=local --extra_toolchains=//:all //src:bazelWhich operating system are you running Bazel on?
linux
What is the output of
bazel info release?release 7.0.2
If
bazel info releasereturnsdevelopment versionor(@non-git), tell us how you built Bazel.No response
What's the output of
git remote get-url origin; git rev-parse HEAD?No response
Is this a regression? If yes, please try to identify the Bazel commit where the bug was introduced.
No response
Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?
No response
Any other information, logs, or outputs that you want to share?
No response