Skip to content

Comments

Revert "Pass -object_path_lto <path> linker flag for LTO builds (#420)"#426

Merged
keith merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ks/revert-pass-object_path_lto-path-linker-flag-for-lto-builds-420
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

Revert "Pass -object_path_lto <path> linker flag for LTO builds (#420)"#426
keith merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ks/revert-pass-object_path_lto-path-linker-flag-for-lto-builds-420

Conversation

@keith
Copy link
Member

@keith keith commented Aug 28, 2025

Fixes #423

We should re-apply with the actual configs for full_lto and thin_lto, we
should be able to write a test to verify it works too.

This reverts commit 61b44d1.

@keith
Copy link
Member Author

keith commented Aug 28, 2025

cc @sanju-naik

Fixes #423

We should re-apply with the actual configs for full_lto and thin_lto, we
should be able to write a test to verify it works too.

This reverts commit 61b44d1.
@keith keith force-pushed the ks/revert-pass-object_path_lto-path-linker-flag-for-lto-builds-420 branch from fd92720 to b2e5e78 Compare August 28, 2025 15:52
@keith keith merged commit 4c51f10 into master Aug 28, 2025
12 checks passed
@keith keith deleted the ks/revert-pass-object_path_lto-path-linker-flag-for-lto-builds-420 branch August 28, 2025 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Thinlto build is requested, but the C++ toolchain doesn't define an action_config for 'lto-backend' action

2 participants