fix(flashblocks): add missing fields to rpc#624
Merged
danyalprout merged 1 commit intomainfrom Jan 30, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
✅ Heimdall Review Status
|
danyalprout
requested review from
haardikk21 and
refcell
and removed request for
refcell
refcell
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2026
Contributor
refcell
left a comment
refcell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM pending another review
refcell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
## Summary Implement `alloy_consensus::InMemorySize` trait for op consensus types. ## Motivation Part of a multi-repo effort to move the `InMemorySize` trait from reth into alloy (done in [alloy#3656](alloy-rs/alloy#3656)). With the trait now in alloy-consensus, reth can re-export it instead of defining it locally. However, due to the orphan rule, the op type impls must live in op-alloy. ## Changes - Bump `alloy-consensus` minimum to 1.6.2 (which includes `InMemorySize`) - Add `InMemorySize` impls for: `OpTxType`, `TxDeposit`, `OpDepositReceipt`, `OpReceipt`, `OpTypedTransaction`, `OpPooledTransaction`, `OpTxEnvelope` ## Testing ``` cargo check -p op-alloy-consensus --all-features cargo test -p op-alloy-consensus ``` Prompted by: mattsse --------- Co-authored-by: Amp <[email protected]>
refcell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
## Summary Implement `alloy_consensus::InMemorySize` trait for op consensus types. ## Motivation Part of a multi-repo effort to move the `InMemorySize` trait from reth into alloy (done in [alloy#3656](alloy-rs/alloy#3656)). With the trait now in alloy-consensus, reth can re-export it instead of defining it locally. However, due to the orphan rule, the op type impls must live in op-alloy. ## Changes - Bump `alloy-consensus` minimum to 1.6.2 (which includes `InMemorySize`) - Add `InMemorySize` impls for: `OpTxType`, `TxDeposit`, `OpDepositReceipt`, `OpReceipt`, `OpTypedTransaction`, `OpPooledTransaction`, `OpTxEnvelope` ## Testing ``` cargo check -p op-alloy-consensus --all-features cargo test -p op-alloy-consensus ``` Prompted by: mattsse --------- Co-authored-by: Amp <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add the missing fields to pending blocks. These are:
Context
Diff between op-reth and base-node-reth
