Fix CodeMirror example with newly introduced CodeMirror dependency#97
Merged
borkdude merged 1 commit intobabashka:mainfrom Dec 11, 2024
jurjanpaul:codemirror-example-find-cluster-breaks-dependency
Merged
Fix CodeMirror example with newly introduced CodeMirror dependency#97borkdude merged 1 commit intobabashka:mainfrom jurjanpaul:codemirror-example-find-cluster-breaks-dependency
borkdude merged 1 commit intobabashka:mainfrom
jurjanpaul:codemirror-example-find-cluster-breaks-dependency
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please answer the following questions and leave the below in as part of your PR.
I have read the developer documentation.
This PR corresponds to an issue with a clear problem statement.
Yes, The CodeMirror example is broken because a new version of @codemirror/state was pushed that introduces a new dependency #96
=> I suppose this is not relevant in this case as this only affects an example, but please let me know otherwise.