You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Support FSx for Lustre MetadataConfiguration on ParallelCluster-managed Persistent 2 filesystems #7616
Please expose Amazon FSx for Lustre enhanced metadata performance configuration for ParallelCluster-managed Persistent 2 filesystems.
Use case
We create short-lived sequencing-analysis clusters with FSx Lustre storage and S3 data repository associations. We want ParallelCluster and its CloudFormation stack to own filesystem creation and deletion so that the storage lifecycle follows the cluster. Creating FSx separately and attaching it by FileSystemId makes that lifecycle harder to manage and increases the risk of leaving billable resources behind.
Current limitation
In ParallelCluster 3.16.1, FsxLustreSettings does not expose MetadataConfiguration, and the managed FSx CloudFormation renderer does not pass it to the filesystem resource.
FSx requires the metadata configuration to be specified when the filesystem is created. It cannot be added later to a filesystem created without that configuration. Consequently, creating a filesystem through ParallelCluster and updating it after creation does not recover this capability.
Also support USER_PROVISIONED with an explicit Iops value, subject to FSx service constraints.
Please include:
Schema/model support and rendering into AWS::FSx::FileSystem LustreConfiguration.MetadataConfiguration.
Validation for supported deployment types, Lustre versions, storage types, modes, and IOPS combinations.
Documented update behavior consistent with FSx restrictions.
No change to existing behavior when the field is omitted.
This is about metadata operation throughput and later metadata scalability; it is separate from S3 lazy hydration, data import policies, and cache release.
Activity
joehellmersNOAA commentedon Sep 10, 2026
+1 on this from me
himani2411 commentedon Sep 28, 2026
Hi @iamh2o,
Thanks for the description of the Feature request. We will prioritize it as part of our backlog.