I wanted to use the mask feature to mask out some missing values in my image due to saturated pixels. There should be enough information in the surrounding pixels to do PSF fit, however, I discovered that `psf_photometry` accepts as `mask` keyword, but never uses it in the code: https://github.com/astropy/photutils/blob/master/photutils/psf.py#L327 Is that a bug or a feature to be implemented in the future (in that case is should probably raise a `NotImplementedError` for now...)?
Activity
cdeil commentedon Aug 27, 2014
The PSF photometry code is unfinished ... see open issues here:
https://github.com/astropy/photutils/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Apsf
@hamogu As far as I know no-one is actively working on it, so if you have bandwidth to finish the implementation or add tests / docs, please do.
hamogu commentedon Sep 5, 2014
#159 is one possible implementation that coud solve this.
Existing tests for PSF/PRF now pass.
Existing tests for PSF/PRF now pass.