Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Hi there @mhvk 👋 - thanks for the pull request! I'm just a friendly 🤖 that checks for issues related to the changelog and making sure that this pull request is milestoned and labeled correctly. This is mainly intended for the maintainers, so if you are not a maintainer you can ignore this, and a maintainer will let you know if any action is required on your part 😃. I see this is a work in progress pull request. I'll report back on the checks once the PR is ready for review. If there are any issues with this message, please report them here. |
3 similar comments
|
Hi there @mhvk 👋 - thanks for the pull request! I'm just a friendly 🤖 that checks for issues related to the changelog and making sure that this pull request is milestoned and labeled correctly. This is mainly intended for the maintainers, so if you are not a maintainer you can ignore this, and a maintainer will let you know if any action is required on your part 😃. I see this is a work in progress pull request. I'll report back on the checks once the PR is ready for review. If there are any issues with this message, please report them here. |
|
Hi there @mhvk 👋 - thanks for the pull request! I'm just a friendly 🤖 that checks for issues related to the changelog and making sure that this pull request is milestoned and labeled correctly. This is mainly intended for the maintainers, so if you are not a maintainer you can ignore this, and a maintainer will let you know if any action is required on your part 😃. I see this is a work in progress pull request. I'll report back on the checks once the PR is ready for review. If there are any issues with this message, please report them here. |
|
Hi there @mhvk 👋 - thanks for the pull request! I'm just a friendly 🤖 that checks for issues related to the changelog and making sure that this pull request is milestoned and labeled correctly. This is mainly intended for the maintainers, so if you are not a maintainer you can ignore this, and a maintainer will let you know if any action is required on your part 😃. I see this is a work in progress pull request. I'll report back on the checks once the PR is ready for review. If there are any issues with this message, please report them here. |
|
Hi humans 👋 - this pull request hasn't had any new commits for approximately 6 months. I plan to close this in a month if the pull request doesn't have any new commits by then. In lieu of a stalled pull request, please consider closing this and open an issue instead if a reminder is needed to revisit in the future. Maintainers may also choose to add If this PR still needs to be reviewed, as an author, you can rebase it to reset the clock. If you believe I commented on this pull request incorrectly, please report this here. |
0e6efa5 to
ca94631
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8133 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.99% 86.92% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 400 383 -17
Lines 59480 57930 -1550
Branches 1100 1056 -44
==========================================
- Hits 51747 50356 -1391
+ Misses 7092 6960 -132
+ Partials 641 614 -27
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
I have a really nice update for this in the works, but not ready by tomorrow, so changing the milestone. Also, as discussed with @eteq offline, it probably is better not to introduce major new features in an LTS; ideally, we just have a nice release in which everything works well so people can safely upgrade. |
|
Hi humans 👋 - this pull request hasn't had any new commits for approximately 5 months. I plan to close this in a month if the pull request doesn't have any new commits by then. In lieu of a stalled pull request, please consider closing this and open an issue instead if a reminder is needed to revisit in the future. Maintainers may also choose to add If this PR still needs to be reviewed, as an author, you can rebase it to reset the clock. If you believe I commented on this pull request incorrectly, please report this here. |
|
I'm going to close this pull request as per my previous message. If you think what is being added/fixed here is still important, please remember to open an issue to keep track of it. Thanks! If this is the first time I am commenting on this issue, or if you believe I closed this issue incorrectly, please report this here. |
|
See #10423 for a much more developed version. |
|
Superceded by #11127 |
A revival of #6005 so @astrofrog can have a look. DO NOT MERGE.
I'm still far from sure this is the right way; a
Maskedmixin similar to the newDistributionclass inuncertaintymight make more sense.