Skip to content

Removing superflous test marked with xfail - #6722

Merged
mhvk merged 1 commit into
astropy:masterfrom
bsipocz:table_remove_xpassing_xfail
Oct 13, 2017
Merged

mhvk merged 1 commit into
astropy:masterfrom
bsipocz:table_remove_xpassing_xfail

Conversation

@bsipocz

@bsipocz bsipocz commented Oct 12, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR is to partially address #6665.

1 of the 3 xpassing tests is a clear case as renaming mixin columns has been implemented since 1.3 (#5469). The PR implementing it also added tests rather than removed the xfail from the existing one, so this one became superfluous and thus I suggest to remove it altogether.

@astropy-bot

astropy-bot Bot commented Oct 12, 2017 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi there @bsipocz 👋 - thanks for the pull request! I'm just a friendly 🤖 that checks for issues related to the changelog and making sure that this pull request is milestoned and labelled correctly. This is mainly intended for the maintainers, so if you are not a maintainer you can ignore this, and a maintainer will let you know if any action is required on your part 😃.

Everything looks good from my point of view! 👍

If there are any issues with this message, please report them here

@bsipocz

bsipocz commented Oct 12, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Travis failure is totally unrelated, and since the queue is rather long, no point in restarting the failing job.

@mhvk mhvk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for noticing, @bsipocz and @pllim!

@mhvk
mhvk merged commit 9cff0e5 into astropy:master Oct 13, 2017
bsipocz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2017
Removing superflous test marked with xfail
@bsipocz
bsipocz deleted the table_remove_xpassing_xfail branch September 16, 2024 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants