Skip to content

Correct Ci definition - #5106

Merged
astrofrog merged 3 commits into
astropy:masterfrom
registerrier:patch-1
Jun 17, 2016
Merged

astrofrog merged 3 commits into
astropy:masterfrom
registerrier:patch-1

Conversation

@registerrier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change defintion to Ci = Bq * 3.7e10 instead of Ci = Bq / 3.7e10

Change defintion to  Ci = Bq * 3.7e10  instead of  Ci =  Bq / 3.7e10
@mhvk mhvk added this to the v1.0.10 milestone Jun 15, 2016
@mhvk mhvk self-assigned this Jun 15, 2016
@mhvk

mhvk commented Jun 15, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ouch! Thanks for catching that. Could you add an entry in CHANGES.rst in the bug-fix section for 1.0? @astrofrog - is that section correct? Obviously would be nice to have in 1.2 as well...

@mhvk mhvk mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2016
13 of 14 tasks
@astrofrog astrofrog modified the milestones: v1.0.11, v1.0.10 Jun 15, 2016
@registerrier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I added bug fix entry for v1.0.11 in CHANGE.rst

@astrofrog

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@registerrier - thanks! There is now a test failure that is due to an example in the documentation that needs updating:

316   >>> u.Hz.find_equivalent_units()
Differences (unified diff with -expected +actual):
    @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
    -  Primary name | Unit definition | Aliases
    +  Primary name | Unit definition | Aliases
     [
       Bq           | 1 / s           | becquerel    ,
    -  Ci           | 2.7027e-11 / s  | curie        ,
    +  Ci           | 3.7e+10 / s     | curie        ,
       Hz           | 1 / s           | Hertz, hertz ,
     ]

in docs/units/equivalencies.rst. Can you change 2.7027e-11 to 3.7e+10 in that example?

@astrofrog
astrofrog merged commit 0161653 into astropy:master Jun 17, 2016
@astrofrog

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @registerrier!

astrofrog added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2016
astrofrog added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants