Skip to content

Conversation

@astronomeralex
Copy link
Contributor

these changes are for issue #3029

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe "Moffat" here instead, and in a couple places below.

@embray
Copy link
Member

embray commented Nov 14, 2014

I've waffled a bit over whether or not this needs anything more than the name change--like whether it should try to maintain backwards compatibility or not. But my inclination is leaning toward "no, this is enough".

It will need a changelog entry under "API Changes" for 1.0 though.

@cdeil
Copy link
Member

cdeil commented Dec 11, 2014

@astronomeralex Can you please rebase this PR against master?
This should also fix the travis-ci fails ... they are unrelated (a timeout and a spurious fail from vo.samp) ...

@astrofrog
Copy link
Member

@astronomeralex - just a reminder, can you rebase this against master?

hamogu added a commit to hamogu/astropy that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2014
This commit follows on a rebase, where I rebased the work of astropy#3102 on the
current master. Thus, this closes astropy#3102 which in turn fixes astropy#3029.

@astronomeralex You did a great job in astropy#3102 and if I had not screwed up the rebase
(I deleted the wrong line in a merge conflict) then my name would not turn up here
at all. I've based this on your branch and github will recognize you are the author
for your commits.
As you may have observed, it is very uncommon in astropy for other people to take over
and finish a pull request that they did not initiate themselves, but I want to make
sure that this makes it into the 1.0 release as it will be much harder to change the
name of a model once 1.0 is released.
@embray embray closed this in #3260 Dec 30, 2014
embray added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2014
Rename beta1d and beta2d - solves issue 3029 (This takes over #3102)
@embray embray removed this from the v1.0.0 milestone Dec 30, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants