Repository navigation
Configuration warnings with clean 0.3.2 -> 0.4 upgrade - #2772
Conversation
Ignore the jquery_url line when calculating md5sum.
|
So, this is kind of a mess. The generated So that means that comparing the configuration file for a known past state from astropy 0.3.2 will always fail unless you are running on my machine with exactly my directory structure. 0.3.1 does not have this problem (since it has no The conda recipe further seems to patch the config file to point to the install directory (very good thing, but I wish that had been reported upstream). Does anyone know where the anaconda recipes are available for viewing? conda/conda-recipes only contains a very out-of-date recipe for astropy 0.2.5. The conda recipe for 0.4 shouldn't need to do this, and I'd like to confirm. The second issue could certainly be related to the first. That warning certainly would appear with a stock astropy 0.3.x config file if the detection that it was unedited failed. |
|
Yuck. It'll be great when we're over this hump with the config system :) |
|
I guess this is good to merge? I want to release 0.4.1 today so that I can stop hearing about #2749. |
|
On the point of where you can see Anaconda recipes, for packages that I have built myself and put on binstar, the recipe is easily available in the installed environment as |
|
Yeah, I think this is ready. |
Configuration warnings with clean 0.3.2 -> 0.4 upgrade
Configuration warnings with clean 0.3.2 -> 0.4 upgrade
To reproduce:
.astropyfolder in home directoryconda install astropy=0.3.2conda install astropy=0.4from astropy.io import fits, gives:I've also seen the same error as this person is reporting:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24852262/astropy-deprecation-warning
with a slightly different upgrade path (can't remember exactly how!) on a machine on which I had not edited
astropy.cfg. To repeat their error:Might the two be related?
cc @mdboom