Repository navigation
Added some entries for 0.4 what’s new. - #2560
Conversation
|
That looks ok to me @astrofrog ... I guess my inclination would have been for the "what's new" to feature DS9 interaction instead of topcat, as I think more users are likely to be familiar with DS9... But that might be my bias, so either way is fine. Should I issue a PR to add mention of coordinates to what's new, or are you going to add that? I think it should be high on the list (maybe the top?) because it's a pretty important user-facing change. |
|
Oh, I just saw #2416 - is that the tracker for what goes in what's new? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe also say we might drop 2.6 ? This was discussed but I'm not sure if we actually settled or not. And are there any changes to the supported numpy? (I think not, but just checking)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re: 2.6, I don't think we want to drop support yet, I think that 1.0 (the first LTS) should support Python 2.6 because the kind of environments where an LTS might be needed likely could be using something like 2.6 too.
Re: numpy, same argument, I think we should not drop 1.5.x until after 1.0.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, you're probably right. It's annoying, but c'est la vie ...
|
@eteq - it might be easier to simply merge this then open PRs to master for any other changes. |
|
@eteq - can we merge this for now? |
|
Yep - looks like the failure is a red herring, so merging now. |
Added some entries for 0.4 what’s new
@eteq - what do you think of the SAMP entry? I didn't want to show a full example since it would be quite long.
cc @embray @mdboom (since this includes astropy-helpers and config)