Skip to content

Backport PR #18784 on branch v7.2.x (TST/DEP: drop pytest-astropy in favor of corresponding, direct test dependencies) - #20203

Merged
pllim merged 5 commits into
astropy:v7.2.xfrom
neutrinoceros:bp/7.2.x/18784
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

pllim merged 5 commits into
astropy:v7.2.xfrom
neutrinoceros:bp/7.2.x/18784

Conversation

@neutrinoceros

@neutrinoceros neutrinoceros commented Aug 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Manual backport for:

  • By checking this box, the PR author has requested that maintainers do NOT use the "Squash and Merge" button. Maintainers should respect this when possible; however, the final decision is at the discretion of the maintainer that merges the PR.

@neutrinoceros neutrinoceros added this to the v7.2.3 milestone Aug 4, 2026
@neutrinoceros neutrinoceros added testing no-changelog-entry-needed Manual Backport dev-automation skip-basebranch-check Skip base branch check for direct backports Extra CI Run cron CI as part of PR dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Aug 4, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@neutrinoceros neutrinoceros changed the title Backport PR #18784 on branch v7.2.x (TST/DEP: drop pytest-astropy in favor of corresponding, direct test dependencies)" Backport PR #18784 on branch v7.2.x (TST/DEP: drop pytest-astropy in favor of corresponding, direct test dependencies) Aug 4, 2026
Comment thread tox.ini Resolved
pllim added 2 commits August 4, 2026 18:58
…stropy

TST/DEP: drop pytest-astropy in favor of corresponding, direct test dependencies
pllim added 2 commits August 4, 2026 16:40
for oldestdeps job only but not in v8.0.x and main, specifically:

Jupyter is migrating its paths to use standard platformdirs
@pllim
pllim marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 21:19
@pllim
pllim requested a review from taldcroft as a code owner August 4, 2026 21:19
@pllim

pllim commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think we're at a good place now, but I'll wait for cron jobs to finish before approving.

@pllim
pllim merged commit 5b3d897 into astropy:v7.2.x Aug 5, 2026
40 of 44 checks passed
@neutrinoceros
neutrinoceros deleted the bp/7.2.x/18784 branch August 5, 2026 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file dev-automation Docs Extra CI Run cron CI as part of PR Manual Backport no-changelog-entry-needed skip-basebranch-check Skip base branch check for direct backports testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants