Skip to content

CI: document intended mission for devdeps weekly cron jobs [ci-skip] - #20202

Merged
pllim merged 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
neutrinoceros:ci/document-weekly-cron-intent
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

pllim merged 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
neutrinoceros:ci/document-weekly-cron-intent

Conversation

@neutrinoceros

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Follow up to #20199

  • By checking this box, the PR author has requested that maintainers do NOT use the "Squash and Merge" button. Maintainers should respect this when possible; however, the final decision is at the discretion of the maintainer that merges the PR.

@neutrinoceros neutrinoceros added this to the v7.2.3 milestone Aug 4, 2026
@neutrinoceros neutrinoceros added testing Docs skip-changelog-checks Tells bot to skip changlog checks backport-v7.2.x on-merge: backport to v7.2.x backport-v8.0.x on-merge: backport to v8.0.x labels Aug 4, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@pllim pllim left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds reasonable. Thanks!

@pllim

pllim commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Weird, CI still ran.

@pllim
pllim merged commit 8fd38bc into astropy:main Aug 4, 2026
55 of 64 checks passed
@lumberbot-app

lumberbot-app Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me.

There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:

  1. Checkout backport branch and update it.
git checkout v7.2.x
git pull
  1. Cherry pick the first parent branch of the this PR on top of the older branch:
git cherry-pick -x -m1 8fd38bc2b92aa793571d15a1d1d37f1f765d8471
  1. You will likely have some merge/cherry-pick conflict here, fix them and commit:
git commit -am 'Backport PR #20202: CI: document intended mission for devdeps weekly cron jobs [ci-skip]'
  1. Push to a named branch:
git push YOURFORK v7.2.x:auto-backport-of-pr-20202-on-v7.2.x
  1. Create a PR against branch v7.2.x, I would have named this PR:

"Backport PR #20202 on branch v7.2.x (CI: document intended mission for devdeps weekly cron jobs [ci-skip])"

And apply the correct labels and milestones.

Congratulations — you did some good work! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon!

Remember to remove the Still Needs Manual Backport label once the PR gets merged.

If these instructions are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement.

@lumberbot-app

lumberbot-app Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me.

There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:

  1. Checkout backport branch and update it.
git checkout v8.0.x
git pull
  1. Cherry pick the first parent branch of the this PR on top of the older branch:
git cherry-pick -x -m1 8fd38bc2b92aa793571d15a1d1d37f1f765d8471
  1. You will likely have some merge/cherry-pick conflict here, fix them and commit:
git commit -am 'Backport PR #20202: CI: document intended mission for devdeps weekly cron jobs [ci-skip]'
  1. Push to a named branch:
git push YOURFORK v8.0.x:auto-backport-of-pr-20202-on-v8.0.x
  1. Create a PR against branch v8.0.x, I would have named this PR:

"Backport PR #20202 on branch v8.0.x (CI: document intended mission for devdeps weekly cron jobs [ci-skip])"

And apply the correct labels and milestones.

Congratulations — you did some good work! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon!

Remember to remove the Still Needs Manual Backport label once the PR gets merged.

If these instructions are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement.

@neutrinoceros
neutrinoceros deleted the ci/document-weekly-cron-intent branch August 4, 2026 16:29
@neutrinoceros

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

maybe not worth the (admitedly minor) pain of backporting ?

@pllim

pllim commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

For v8.0.x, I piggyback this backport in #20204 . Hope you don't mind.

For v7.2.x, I plan to do the same in #20203 after the tox.ini file is fixed. (I can fix it later if it is getting too late for you.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-v7.2.x on-merge: backport to v7.2.x backport-v8.0.x on-merge: backport to v8.0.x Docs skip-changelog-checks Tells bot to skip changlog checks testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants