Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.
|
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
that happens on import from numpy 2.5.dev because we turn warning into exception and this is blocking meaningful devdeps run for others.
e0a31ef to
306a8e2
Compare
neutrinoceros
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I implied on the issue I'm not a fan of this approach but provided @saimn is okay with it I'm on board.
mhvk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, makes sense to "buy some time" to figure out the best path forward (and in the meantime have a working -dev...)
|
I thought #19267 would solve the issue for main ? Then we can imagine a simplified version (just filtering the warning from Numpy) for 7.2.x, but would be better if the code was closer to #19267 (e..g filtering the warning in |
|
I am just not sure how much more time #19267 needs. So should I close this PR without merge or move the ignore as you suggested? Please advise. Thanks! |
|
I think we could merge #19267 to fix -dev and deal with |
Description
This pull request is to temporarily works around #19216 until #3862 and other related issues/PRs can be resolved. They seem to take a slower timescale because FITS is a complicated beast that is widely used.