Skip to content

DOC: Backport with milestone instead of labels - #18829

Closed
pllim wants to merge 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
pllim:backport-with-milestone
Closed

pllim wants to merge 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
pllim:backport-with-milestone

Conversation

@pllim

@pllim pllim commented Nov 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

This pull request is to update the documentation portion of #18814

  • By checking this box, the PR author has requested that maintainers do NOT use the "Squash and Merge" button. Maintainers should respect this when possible; however, the final decision is at the discretion of the maintainer that merges the PR.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Welcome to Astropy 👋 and congratulations on your first pull
request! 🎉

A project member will respond to you as soon as possible; in the
meantime, please have a look over the Checklist for Contributed
Code

and make sure you've addressed as many of the questions there as
possible.

If you feel that this pull request has not been responded to in a
timely manner, please send a message directly to the
development mailing
list
. If the issue is
urgent or sensitive in nature (e.g., a security vulnerability)
please send an e-mail directly to the private e-mail
[email protected].

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Thank you for your draft pull request! Do you know that you can use [ci skip] or [skip ci] in your commit messages to skip running continuous integration tests until you are ready?

@pllim
pllim requested a review from astrofrog November 3, 2025 22:43
@nstarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I just started using this in https://github.com/GalacticDynamics/unxt. It's great!

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Close? Tell stale bot that this issue/PR is stale label Apr 3, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi humans 👋 - this pull request hasn't had any new commits for approximately 4 months. I plan to close this in 30 days if the pull request doesn't have any new commits by then.

In lieu of a stalled pull request, please consider closing this and open an issue instead if a reminder is needed to revisit in the future. Maintainers may also choose to add keep-open label to keep this PR open but it is discouraged unless absolutely necessary.

If this PR still needs to be reviewed, as an author, you can rebase it to reset the clock.

If you believe I commented on this pull request incorrectly, please report this here.

@pllim

pllim commented Apr 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing for now. Cleaner to start over when we can actually do this.

@pllim pllim closed this Apr 3, 2026
@pllim
pllim deleted the backport-with-milestone branch April 3, 2026 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants