Skip to content

fix ruff rule B007 violation in astropy/modeling - #17860

Merged
neutrinoceros merged 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
kangqiwang:ruff-b007/modeling
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

neutrinoceros merged 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
kangqiwang:ruff-b007/modeling

Conversation

@kangqiwang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This pull request is to address to split pull request #17844 , and it ensure compliance of astropy/modeling to Ruff rule unused-loop-control-variable (B007)

fixes partially #14818

Fixes #

  • By checking this box, the PR author has requested that maintainers do NOT use the "Squash and Merge" button. Maintainers should respect this when possible; however, the final decision is at the discretion of the maintainer that merges the PR.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@pllim pllim added this to the v7.1.0 milestone Mar 6, 2025
Comment thread astropy/modeling/fitting.py Outdated
Comment on lines +1016 to +1017
for i in range(1, self.niter + 1):
n=i

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not understand this one.

Comment thread astropy/modeling/_fitting_parallel.py Resolved
Comment thread astropy/modeling/fitting.py Resolved
@nstarman

nstarman commented Mar 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the PR @kangqiwang. There are sone good opportunities to further simplify the code.

Comment thread astropy/modeling/fitting.py Outdated
Comment on lines +1016 to +1017
for i in range(1, self.niter + 1):
n=i

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this be

Suggested change
for i in range(1, self.niter + 1):
n=i
for _ in range(1, self.niter + 1):

?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The numbers of loops executed is recorded and there is a possibility of breaking early, but you have to go all the way down to line 1109 (or 1108 in main) to see that. I would rename n to niter and replace

Suggested change
for i in range(1, self.niter + 1):
n=i
for _ in range(self.niter):
niter += 1

Then it would be clearer that niter is a counter that will be used after the loop, not just a loop variable.

@neutrinoceros

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I fixed formatting issues and a (spurious) merge conflict. Let's get this in. Thanks @kangqiwang

@neutrinoceros
neutrinoceros enabled auto-merge March 17, 2025 16:13
@neutrinoceros
neutrinoceros merged commit e7f827a into astropy:main Mar 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants