You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the Boston meeting, it was discussed that there would be a tool to check for optional dependencies, list the versions that were found and, where possible, install them. I'm assigning @eteq, because I believe he already has a similar tool in Astropysics.
Yep, this is third on my to-do list after the config and a docs cleanup - It'll also tie pretty closely with the affiliated package index (as they will also certainly have optional deps). In the meantime, lets use this issue to keep track of optional dependencies.
Hm. Let's leave it open for now since #476 is just one possible implementation of this. I'm pretty confident it's what we'll end up going with but I see this as still an "open issue" until some specific solution is merged.
Activity
mdboom commentedon Nov 11, 2011
astropy.io.vohas an optional dependency onxmllint(through the shell -- it is a C command line application).eteq commentedon Nov 11, 2011
Yep, this is third on my to-do list after the config and a docs cleanup - It'll also tie pretty closely with the affiliated package index (as they will also certainly have optional deps). In the meantime, lets use this issue to keep track of optional dependencies.
astropy op deps:
testing op deps:
eteq commentedon Jun 13, 2012
This was originally intended for 0.1, but it looks like it will need to be triaged for 0.2. Note that part of this is ongoing at https://github.com/eteq/astropy/tree/dependencies
wkerzendorf commentedon Dec 14, 2012
@iguananaut: I marked the #476 PR as 0.2 milestone (tentatively). Can this issue then be closed?
embray commentedon Dec 14, 2012
Hm. Let's leave it open for now since #476 is just one possible implementation of this. I'm pretty confident it's what we'll end up going with but I see this as still an "open issue" until some specific solution is merged.
astrofrog commentedon Jan 20, 2013
I'm re-scheduling this as 0.2.1 since I also re-scheduled #476.
astrofrog commentedon Sep 20, 2013
Re-scheduling this for 0.4.0 - I don't think it's important enough to worry about for now
eteq commentedon Jun 5, 2014
Closing a la discussion in #476
Merge pull request #63 from lpsinger/tick_angle_non_square_axes