You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Indeed--I think last time we tried to tackle EM units in CGS the equivalency system didn't even exist yet. I guess there would have to be a set of equivalencies like statcoulomb_charge, statcoulomb_flux, etc. (or just one coulomb_statcoulomb that takes the context as an argument).
It might be good to somehow incorporate the cgs constants into this--i.e. to make sure that e_esu is correctly converted to e under this equivalency.
Activity
embray commentedon Aug 19, 2015
Indeed--I think last time we tried to tackle EM units in CGS the equivalency system didn't even exist yet. I guess there would have to be a set of equivalencies like
statcoulomb_charge,statcoulomb_flux, etc. (or just onecoulomb_statcoulombthat takes the context as an argument).It might be good to somehow incorporate the cgs constants into this--i.e. to make sure that
e_esuis correctly converted toeunder this equivalency.mhvk commentedon Apr 12, 2021
closing in favour of #4359