You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I mean the ability to write new transformations, that don't perhaps behave like FITS WCS, and have those algorithms easily interchanged, since they would all have a common interface.
You mean as a future replacement for the current WCS system (once all the current functionality is re-implemented in this scheme), or as a compliment to it?
@eteq - I wonder if we can close this? In a way, astropy.modeling and astropy.coordinates both kind of allow this? (and I don't think we're going to change astropy.wcs - the FITS-WCS part - to do this).
Hi humans 👋 - this issue was labeled as Close? approximately 5 months ago. If you think this issue should not be closed, a maintainer should remove the Close? label - otherwise, I will close this issue in a month.
If you believe I commented on this issue incorrectly, please report this here
I'm going to close this issue as per my previous message, but if you feel that this issue should stay open, then feel free to re-open and remove the Close? label.
If this is the first time I am commenting on this issue, or if you believe I closed this issue incorrectly, please report this here
Activity
eteq commentedon Apr 26, 2012
Just so we're all on the same page, by this you mean a sort of python/cython-implemented generalized WCS, right?
mdboom commentedon Apr 26, 2012
I mean the ability to write new transformations, that don't perhaps behave like FITS WCS, and have those algorithms easily interchanged, since they would all have a common interface.
eteq commentedon Apr 27, 2012
You mean as a future replacement for the current WCS system (once all the current functionality is re-implemented in this scheme), or as a compliment to it?
astrofrog commentedon Sep 20, 2013
Re-scheduling for 0.4.0
astrofrog commentedon Aug 23, 2018
@eteq - I wonder if we can close this? In a way, astropy.modeling and astropy.coordinates both kind of allow this? (and I don't think we're going to change astropy.wcs - the FITS-WCS part - to do this).
astropy-bot commentedon Jan 26, 2019
Hi humans 👋 - this issue was labeled as Close? approximately 5 months ago. If you think this issue should not be closed, a maintainer should remove the Close? label - otherwise, I will close this issue in a month.
If you believe I commented on this issue incorrectly, please report this here
pllim commentedon Jan 28, 2019
Isn't this basically GWCS now, @nden ?
astropy-bot commentedon Feb 26, 2019
I'm going to close this issue as per my previous message, but if you feel that this issue should stay open, then feel free to re-open and remove the Close? label.
If this is the first time I am commenting on this issue, or if you believe I closed this issue incorrectly, please report this here
Merge pull request astropy#211 from astrofrog/add-ratings