Detect cases where uv partially removed a virtual environment and retry#14569
Closed
Detect cases where uv partially removed a virtual environment and retry#14569
Conversation
zanieb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
An alternative to #14569 This isn't a complete solution to #13986, in the sense that it's still "fatal" to `uv sync` if we fail to delete an environment, but I think that's okay — deferring deletion is much more complicated. This at least doesn't break users once the deletion fails. The downside is we'll generally treat this virtual environment is valid, even if we nuked a bunch of it. Closes #13986
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a sort of janky fix for #13986 where we use a
.venv/.uv-partial-rmmarker to indicate that we attempted to delete an environment but failed then use that to allow deletion of an environment despite a missingpyvenv.cfgmarker.I think we may better be served by another approach, but this was an idea I wanted to sketch.