[ruff] Restore example code for Python versions before 3.15 (RUF017)#25439
Merged
Conversation
MichaReiser
approved these changes
May 28, 2026
anishgirianish
pushed a commit
to anishgirianish/ruff
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2026
…7`) (astral-sh#25439) Summary -- Closes astral-sh#25436 by restoring the previous `Use instead:` snippet from before astral-sh#23789 I thought it would be cool to use the tabs like we have for pyproject.toml vs ruff.toml snippets, but I wasn't sure if that would render well in other contexts where we use rule docs and opted just to have two separate code blocks.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #25436 by restoring the previous
Use instead:snippet from before #23789I thought it would be cool to use the tabs like we have for pyproject.toml vs ruff.toml snippets, but I wasn't sure if that would render well in other contexts where we use rule docs and opted just to have two separate code blocks.