[ty] Extract relation module from types.rs#22232
Merged
MichaReiser merged 1 commit intomainfrom Jan 5, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Diagnostic diff on typing conformance testsNo changes detected when running ty on typing conformance tests ✅ |
|
AlexWaygood
approved these changes
Dec 29, 2025
daf4ed4 to
018440c
Compare
018440c to
8b5caa5
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR introduces a new
relation.rsmodule that implements the type relation (anythingTypeRelation) methods onType.This reduces the size of
types.rsby about 2.5k lines.A follow-up change could be to extract all type-var-related code into a
type_varmodule.I started on this because I had a very slim hope that reducing the size of
types.rswould help compile times... It doesn't do in any meaningful way.Test Plan
cargo