[ruff]: Build loongarch64 binaries in CI#20361
Merged
ntBre merged 1 commit intoastral-sh:mainfrom Sep 12, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
ntBre
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2025
Contributor
ntBre
left a comment
ntBre
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you! This looks good to me
woodruffw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2025
This reverts commit ec863bc.
woodruffw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2025
SkyBird233
added a commit
to SkyBird233/ruff
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following: - Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.) - Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix with `[ty]` for ty pull requests.) - Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues? --> <!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? --> This PR adds support for building loongarch64 binaries in CI. As such support has been merged in uv (astral-sh/uv#15387) it's time to consider adding it to ruff. Please note that as Ubuntu is not yet available for loongarch64, I have elected to use a Debian Trixie container maintained by community members. In addition, as Debian's pip does not allow installing modules system-wide, I have modified the workflow to install additional modules in a virtual environment. Since the workflow is shared between all targets, the only way to handle this difference (between Debian and Ubuntu) is just to install pip in a venv for all targets. If there is a better (and less intrusive) way to work around this, please let me know. Tests are included in CI and the loongarch64 artifacts built in [this workflow](https://github.com/SkyBird233/ruff/actions/runs/17640270032/job/50125471548) has been smoke tested.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds support for building loongarch64 binaries in CI. As such support has been merged in uv (astral-sh/uv#15387) it's time to consider adding it to ruff.
Please note that as Ubuntu is not yet available for loongarch64, I have elected to use a Debian Trixie container maintained by community members. In addition, as Debian's pip does not allow installing modules system-wide, I have modified the workflow to install additional modules in a virtual environment.
Since the workflow is shared between all targets, the only way to handle this difference (between Debian and Ubuntu) is just to install pip in a venv for all targets. If there is a better (and less intrusive) way to work around this, please let me know.
Test Plan
Tests are included in CI and the loongarch64 artifacts built in this workflow has been smoke tested.