[red-knot] Add some narrowing for assignment expressions#17448
Merged
carljm merged 2 commits intoastral-sh:mainfrom Apr 18, 2025
Merged
[red-knot] Add some narrowing for assignment expressions#17448carljm merged 2 commits intoastral-sh:mainfrom
carljm merged 2 commits intoastral-sh:mainfrom
Conversation
MatthewMckee4
requested review from
AlexWaygood,
carljm,
dcreager and
sharkdp
as code owners
MatthewMckee4
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
There is still more to cover regarding named expressions. Such as: def f() -> bool: ...
if x := f():
reveal_type(x) # revealed: Literal[True]
else:
reveal_type(x) # revealed: Literal[False] |
Contributor
|
Contributor
Author
|
mypy_primer looks good |
MatthewMckee4
changed the title
MatthewMckee4
commented
Apr 17, 2025
carljm
reviewed
Apr 17, 2025
Contributor
carljm
left a comment
carljm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks really good, thank you!
There is still more to cover regarding named expressions.
Not required if you don't have time, but it would be really cool if this PR could just establish full parity, since it should be generally true that anywhere we would narrow on a Name, we should also be able to narrow on a NamedExpr. (If we don't reach parity, then I wouldn't want to close the associated issue yet.) And it doesn't seem like we are very far from that? It looks like a NamedExpr version of evaluate_name_expr (to intersect with AlwaysFalsy or AlwaysTruthy) would just be like five or six lines?
Contributor
Author
|
Okay, if you think I should do that in this PR, then I'll get that done |
…emt expression narrowing
Contributor
Author
|
Im not sure what else i need to cover |
carljm
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2025
Contributor
carljm
left a comment
carljm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks to me like you got everything! Thank you!!
Contributor
|
I also re-checked the updated ecosystem results and they look good. The new errors are not a regression, they are just cases where other missing features mean there is still a (different) error on the same line that previously had an error. |
dcreager
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2025
* main: [red-knot] class bases are not affected by __future__.annotations (#17456) [red-knot] Add support for overloaded functions (#17366) [`pyupgrade`] Add fix safety section to docs (`UP036`) (#17444) [red-knot] more type-narrowing in match statements (#17302) [red-knot] Add some narrowing for assignment expressions (#17448) [red-knot] Understand `typing.Protocol` and `typing_extensions.Protocol` as equivalent (#17446) Server: Use `min` instead of `max` to limit the number of threads (#17421)
dcreager
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2025
* main: (123 commits) [red-knot] Handle explicit class specialization in type expressions (#17434) [red-knot] allow assignment expression in call compare narrowing (#17461) [red-knot] fix building unions with literals and AlwaysTruthy/AlwaysFalsy (#17451) [red-knot] Type narrowing for assertions (take 2) (#17345) [red-knot] class bases are not affected by __future__.annotations (#17456) [red-knot] Add support for overloaded functions (#17366) [`pyupgrade`] Add fix safety section to docs (`UP036`) (#17444) [red-knot] more type-narrowing in match statements (#17302) [red-knot] Add some narrowing for assignment expressions (#17448) [red-knot] Understand `typing.Protocol` and `typing_extensions.Protocol` as equivalent (#17446) Server: Use `min` instead of `max` to limit the number of threads (#17421) [red-knot] Detect version-related syntax errors (#16379) [`pyflakes`] Add fix safety section (`F841`) (#17410) [red-knot] Add `KnownFunction` variants for `is_protocol`, `get_protocol_members` and `runtime_checkable` (#17450) Bump 0.11.6 (#17449) Auto generate `visit_source_order` (#17180) [red-knot] Initial tests for protocols (#17436) [red-knot] Dataclasses: synthesize `__init__` with proper signature (#17428) [red-knot] Dataclasses: support `order=True` (#17406) [red-knot] Super-basic generic inference at call sites (#17301) ...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes #14866
Fixes #17437
Test Plan
Update mdtests in
narrow/