This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 18, 2018. It is now read-only.
Add a SqlStorage Provider #19
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @rposener, I'm your friendly neighborhood .NET Foundation Pull Request Bot (You can call me DNFBOT). Thanks for your contribution! TTYL, DNFBOT; |
|
@rposener, Thanks for signing the contribution license agreement so quickly! Actual humans will now validate the agreement and then evaluate the PR. |
Contributor
|
Thank you so much! Will have a look ASAP! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With Only Memory Backed, or AzureTable storage options, we lose the ability to scale an application on IaaS. Particularly with the autoscale capabilities of Azure and the legacy components which prevent going full PaaS for our application. Several other vendors are requesting that we develop integrations using webhooks, so we are really looking forward to this project to make that implementation simple.
If you think this has merit, I'm glad to continue to contribute to this effort and will help flesh out the tests, etc. Perhaps it should also use SP's with simple SqlCommands instead? Welcome to thoughts.