-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Merge Release 6.1 Into Master #1471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… rateLimit is set to a low value and it would take very long to read the entire database. Fix this by setting the rateLimit to the maximum allowed value if reading the entire database is taking a long time.
For small clusters that are growing quickly, it could happen that the…
do not log a SevError trace event if we cannot deserialize the connect packet
update installer WIX GUID following release
… with a less than 100% probability.
…rd-estimate-validation Fix consistency check shard estimate validation
* Added support for testing cpack and defined very long directory name for source because of problem with building debug rpms * Added support for building rpms by adding file package * Added preinstall target to prevent cpack from having to do so much compilation as single thread
# Conflicts: # documentation/sphinx/source/release-notes.rst
|
|
||
| * The ``consistencycheck`` fdbserver role would repeatedly exit. [6.1.1] `(PR #1437) <https://github.com/apple/foundationdb/pull/1437>`_ | ||
| * The ``consistencycheck`` fdbserver role could proceed at a very slow rate after inserting data into an empty database. [6.1.2] `(PR #1452) <https://github.com/apple/foundationdb/pull/1452>`_ | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem right. I think this file should match exactly the release notes on the 6.1 branch, but there are a lot of empty headers here that don't appear there. Some of these changes here are also duplicates of ones listed below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have updated these release notes. Can you verify that the 6.2 release notes look correct?
Merged Release 6.1 into local branch of master
Resolved conflict for release notes