Closed
Conversation
…nding methonds, with the help of AI, which has a CS grammatical beauty -- which is just in my opionion.
…ts, modified the type definition in the form of auth_required, which passed all the tests, problem solved!
Member
|
I‘d go with #678, thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thinking of the compatibility to the whole framework and the tests, I used the auth_required return type form, which passed all the tests.
fixes #666
Checklist:
docsfolder and in code docstring.CHANGES.mdsummarizing the change and linking to the issue.*Version changed*or*Version added*note in any relevant docs and docstring.pytestandtox, no tests failed.