Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@srijeet0406
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes #4393.


Which Traffic Control components are affected by this PR?

  • Traffic Ops

What is the best way to verify this PR?

Follow the steps in the related Github issue #4393.

If this is a bugfix, which Traffic Control versions contained the bug?

  • master

PR submission checklist

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7595 (59d406d) into master (c1e70b7) will decrease coverage by 34.51%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #7595       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     64.80%   30.29%   -34.51%     
  Complexity       98       98               
=============================================
  Files           201      793      +592     
  Lines          8158    83442    +75284     
  Branches        898      898               
=============================================
+ Hits           5287    25281    +19994     
- Misses         2689    56040    +53351     
- Partials        182     2121     +1939     
Flag Coverage Δ
golib_unit 48.58% <ø> (?)
grove_unit 4.60% <ø> (?)
t3c_unit 5.31% <ø> (?)
traffic_monitor_unit 21.35% <ø> (?)
traffic_ops_integration 69.42% <ø> (-9.22%) ⬇️
traffic_ops_unit 23.17% <0.00%> (?)
traffic_portal_v2 74.25% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
traffic_stats_unit 10.14% <ø> (?)
unit_tests 27.41% <0.00%> (-46.87%) ⬇️
v3 57.79% <ø> (?)
v4 79.18% <ø> (?)
v5 78.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...fic_ops/traffic_ops_golang/deliveryservice/keys.go 31.59% <0.00%> (ø)
..._ops/traffic_ops_golang/deliveryservice/sslkeys.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
..._golang/trafficvault/backends/postgres/postgres.go 0.47% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 592 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ocket8888 ocket8888 added bug something isn't working as intended Traffic Ops related to Traffic Ops low impact affects only a small portion of a CDN, and cannot itself break one labels Jun 23, 2023
Copy link
Member

@shamrickus shamrickus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

  • Fixes the issue in v5 only
  • Returns the correct status code
  • TP integration tests pass locally

@shamrickus shamrickus merged commit 1e39991 into apache:master Jun 28, 2023
zrhoffman added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2023
…n no ssl keys are present. (#7595)"

This reverts commit 1e39991.
@zrhoffman
Copy link
Member

Reverted in 7d5cebe due to breaking GET /deliveryservices/xmlId/{xmlId}/sslkeys when SSL keys are not present. @srijeet0406 would you please re-PR #7595 now that we know to look out for this regression?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

bug something isn't working as intended low impact affects only a small portion of a CDN, and cannot itself break one Traffic Ops related to Traffic Ops

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DS SSL keys routes return empty 'response' objects on error

4 participants