Skip to content

[SPARK-39979][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Make spark.sql.execution.arrow.useLargeVarTypes as an internal configuration - #41584

Closed
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
HyukjinKwon:SPARK-39979-followup2
Closed

HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
HyukjinKwon:SPARK-39979-followup2

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a followup of #39572 that hides the spark.sql.execution.arrow.useLargeVarTypes configuration as an internal configuration.

Why are the changes needed?

As described in #41569, this feature only works for mapInArrow, and other cases cannot be completely supported because of Arrow side limitation, see apache/arrow#35289. Therefore, this PR hides this configuration as an internal one for now.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, this configuration was not released out yet.

How was this patch tested?

Ran the Scala linter.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the SQL label Jun 14, 2023
@HyukjinKwon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc @Kimahriman for a look.

@Kimahriman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thank you, @HyukjinKwon and @Kimahriman .

czxm pushed a commit to czxm/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2023
…eVarTypes` as an internal configuration

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a followup of apache#39572 that hides the `spark.sql.execution.arrow.useLargeVarTypes` configuration as an internal configuration.

### Why are the changes needed?

As described in apache#41569, this feature only works for `mapInArrow`, and other cases cannot be completely supported because of Arrow side limitation, see apache/arrow#35289. Therefore, this PR hides this configuration as an internal one for now.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, this configuration was not released out yet.

### How was this patch tested?

Ran the Scala linter.

Closes apache#41584 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-39979-followup2.

Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
@HyukjinKwon
HyukjinKwon deleted the SPARK-39979-followup2 branch January 15, 2024 00:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants