Commit a599e43
[SPARK-1134] Fix and document passing of arguments to IPython
This is based on @dianacarroll's previous pull request #227, and @JoshRosen's comments on #38. Since we do want to allow passing arguments to IPython, this does the following:
* It documents that IPython can't be used with standalone jobs for now. (Later versions of IPython will deal with PYTHONSTARTUP properly and enable this, see ipython/ipython#5226, but no released version has that fix.)
* If you run `pyspark` with `IPYTHON=1`, it passes your command-line arguments to it. This way you can do stuff like `IPYTHON=1 bin/pyspark notebook`.
* The old `IPYTHON_OPTS` remains, but I've removed it from the documentation. This is in case people read an old tutorial that uses it.
This is not a perfect solution and I'd also be okay with keeping things as they are today (ignoring `$@` for IPython and using IPYTHON_OPTS), and only doing the doc change. With this change though, when IPython fixes ipython/ipython#5226, people will immediately be able to do `IPYTHON=1 bin/pyspark myscript.py` to run a standalone script and get all the benefits of running scripts in IPython (presumably better debugging and such). Without it, there will be no way to run scripts in IPython.
@JoshRosen you should probably take the final call on this.
Author: Diana Carroll <[email protected]>
Closes #294 from mateiz/spark-1134 and squashes the following commits:
747bb13 [Diana Carroll] SPARK-1134 bug with ipython prevents non-interactive use with spark; only call ipython if no command line arguments were supplied1 parent b8f5341 commit a599e43
1 file changed
+2
-1
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
55 | 55 | | |
56 | 56 | | |
57 | 57 | | |
58 | | - | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
59 | 60 | | |
60 | 61 | | |
61 | 62 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments