feat(bindings/python)!: Stubs fix for operator and __version__#6728
Merged
Xuanwo merged 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom Oct 22, 2025
Merged
feat(bindings/python)!: Stubs fix for operator and __version__#6728Xuanwo merged 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Xuanwo merged 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
dosubot
bot
added
size:L
Member
|
Thank you! So after this PR we don't need breaking changes now? |
Contributor
Author
correct! managed to fix the breaking change from #6720 |
Xuanwo
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2025
Member
Xuanwo
left a comment
Xuanwo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for working on this!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Extension of #6720
Rationale for this change
Closes #6253
What changes are included in this PR?
__version__missing at runtimecapability()->full_capability()->capability(). Fixes for this comment.Are there any user-facing changes?
No.