Merged
Conversation
17 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
Hi, @XmchxUp I've left the |
18cb7c7 to
3bcfeea
Compare
Xuanwo
reviewed
Dec 31, 2024
Member
0d60151 to
c5e7874
Compare
Contributor
|
Thank you @meteorgan.
Of course I'm willing to implement |
b92860e to
4535341
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #5426.
Rationale for this change
Add
if_match,if_none_match,if_modified_sinceandif_unmodified_sinceoptions toreader_withAPI to support conditional reader based on etag and/or modification time.What changes are included in this PR?
a new RFC
Are there any user-facing changes?
new options for
reader_withAPI