Conversation
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
meteorgan
reviewed
Dec 24, 2024
jorgehermo9
reviewed
Dec 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
jorgehermo9
reviewed
Dec 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
messense
reviewed
Dec 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
Thank you all for the review, let's move! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #5407
Rationale for this change
This RFC proposes adding URI-based configuration support to OpenDAL, allowing users to create operators directly from URIs. The proposal introduces a new
from_uriAPI in both theOperatorandConfiguratortraits, along with anOperatorRegistryto manage operator factories.What changes are included in this PR?
New RFC
Are there any user-facing changes?