new feature: Migrate Python package management from maturin to PDM #5371
Description
Feature Description
For now, we use maturin as our package management and build tools for our Python bindings.
I propose use PDM instead of maturin.
Problem and Solution
For now, PDM has already support maturin as build backend
[build-system]
requires = ["maturin>=1.4,<2.0"]
build-backend = "maturin"And we can add extra configuration for Python our python binding like
[tool.pdm.scripts]
test = "pytest"
lint = "pre-commit run --all-files"
[tool.pytest.ini_options]
filterwarnings = [
"ignore::DeprecationWarning"
]
markers = [
"network: Tests that require network",
"integration: Run with all Python versions",
"path: Tests that compare with the system paths",
"deprecated: Tests about deprecated features",
]
addopts = "-vvv -r aR"
testpaths = [
"tests/",
]
pythonpath = [
"src/",
]
[tool.ruff]
line-length = 120
exclude = ["tests/fixtures"]
target-version = "py38"
src = ["src"]
[tool.ruff.lint]
extend-select = [
"I", # isort
"B", # flake8-bugbear
"C4", # flake8-comprehensions
"FA", # flake8-future-annotations
"PGH", # pygrep-hooks
"RUF", # ruff
"W", # pycodestyle
"UP", # pyupgrade
"YTT", # flake8-2020
]
extend-ignore = ["B018", "B019", "RUF018"]
[tool.ruff.lint.mccabe]
max-complexity = 10
[tool.ruff.lint.isort]
known-first-party = ["pdm"]So the developer can run test and lint code more friendly by using command PDM built in like pdm test, pdm lint
Additional Context
No response
Are you willing to contribute to the development of this feature?
- Yes, I am willing to contribute to the development of this feature.