-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.9k
optimize: upgrade protobuf version from 3.25.4 to 3.25.5 #7202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
changes/en-us/2.x.md
Outdated
| - [[#7150](https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/pull/7150)] The time difference between the raft node and the follower node cannot synchronize data | ||
| - [[#7102](https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/pull/7150)] bugfix: modify XA mode pre commit transaction from commit phase to before close phase | ||
| - [[#7188](https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/pull/7188)] bugfix: Fix missing branchType in BusinessActionContext | ||
| - [[#7201](https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/issues/7201)] bugfix: update protobuf.version from 3.25.4 to 3.25.5 to resolve potential DoS issue |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this PR belongs to the security category. What do you think?
Thanks to these contributors for their code commits. Please report an unintended omission.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that makes sense. I have updated the change log
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMHO, @funky-eyes ’ suggestion makes sense.
@s-ramyalakshmi
please add changes in below file too :)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/blob/2.x/changes/zh-cn/2.x.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@YongGoose Thanks for letting me know. I have added changes to zh-cn folder as well.
YongGoose
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM👍
xingfudeshi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #7202 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 51.69% 51.66% -0.03%
+ Complexity 6841 6837 -4
============================================
Files 1169 1169
Lines 41585 41585
Branches 4871 4871
============================================
- Hits 21496 21486 -10
- Misses 18041 18050 +9
- Partials 2048 2049 +1 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
slievrly
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution! It's great to see Seata becoming a global open source community.
|
Hi, Would rebuilding help in passing the check? |
funky-eyes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
If you're using the DingTalk app, please send your DingTalk account to my email at |
I have sent you an email. Thank you! |
I apologize for the late reply, but I've searched through my inbox and couldn't find any email from you. I'm quite confused about this. Would you mind sending the email again? |
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
Resolved potential Denial of Service issue of protobuf-java by upgrading the version from 3.25.4 to 3.25.5.
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
fixes #7201
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
N/A
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews