optimize: upgrade tomcat-embed to 9.0.98 #7134
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #7134 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 52.99% 52.03% -0.97%
+ Complexity 6822 6709 -113
============================================
Files 1145 1145
Lines 40559 40559
Branches 4737 4737
============================================
- Hits 21494 21104 -390
- Misses 17017 17473 +456
+ Partials 2048 1982 -66 |
1 task
slievrly
added a commit
to slievrly/fescar
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2025
YvCeung
pushed a commit
to YvCeung/incubator-seata
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
upgrade tomcat-embed to 9.0.98
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/193
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/194
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/195
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/196
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/197
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/198
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/199
https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/security/dependabot/200
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews