Spark 3.4: Backport #12836 for row lineage support in spark parquet reader#13353
Merged
amogh-jahagirdar merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Jun 19, 2025
Merged
Spark 3.4: Backport #12836 for row lineage support in spark parquet reader#13353amogh-jahagirdar merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
amogh-jahagirdar merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
amogh-jahagirdar
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
Contributor
amogh-jahagirdar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @geruh, this looks like a clean backport so I'll just go ahead and merge after checks pass.
devendra-nr
pushed a commit
to devendra-nr/iceberg
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the support added to spark readers for row lineage to spark 3.4. This back port is based on the changes added in #12836, and is 1:1 change no 3.4 specific changes necessary.
cc: @amogh-jahagirdar