Skip to content

[Bug-fix] Type inconsistency in RpcServiceContext.localInvoke field causes NullPointerException #15475 #15536

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
zrlw merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025
Merged

[Bug-fix] Type inconsistency in RpcServiceContext.localInvoke field causes NullPointerException #15475 #15536

zrlw merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025

Conversation

@huangtaojava
Copy link
Contributor

@huangtaojava huangtaojava commented Jul 10, 2025

[Bug-fix] Type inconsistency in RpcServiceContext.localInvoke field causes NullPointerException #15475

What is the purpose of the change?

Prevent the null Pointer Exception when the setLocalInvoke method accepts a null value as a parameter

Checklist

  • Make sure there is a GitHub_issue field for the change.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add sample in dubbo samples project.
  • Make sure gitHub actions can pass. Why the workflow is failing and how to fix it?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.82%. Comparing base (86dd988) to head (8e1f4b0).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                3.3   #15536      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     58.83%   58.82%   -0.02%     
  Complexity       12       12              
============================================
  Files          1908     1908              
  Lines         86693    86693              
  Branches      12997    12997              
============================================
- Hits          51008    50996      -12     
- Misses        30099    30110      +11     
- Partials       5586     5587       +1
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 58.82% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@zrlw zrlw added type/bug Bugs to being fixed good first issue Good for starters to contribute labels Jul 10, 2025
@zrlw zrlw merged commit b5fca6f into apache:3.3 Jul 10, 2025
24 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

good first issue Good for starters to contribute type/bug Bugs to being fixed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@huangtaojava @codecov-commenter @zrlw