Skip to content

remove strong dep micrometer in tracing#14986

Merged
AlbumenJ merged 8 commits intoapache:3.3from
songxiaosheng:3.3
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

remove strong dep micrometer in tracing#14986
AlbumenJ merged 8 commits intoapache:3.3from
songxiaosheng:3.3

Conversation

@songxiaosheng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of the change?

remove strong dep micrometer in tracing
fix pr: #14872

Checklist

  • Make sure there is a GitHub_issue field for the change.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add sample in dubbo samples project.
  • Make sure gitHub actions can pass. Why the workflow is failing and how to fix it?

@AlbumenJ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please fix style check

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.74%. Comparing base (09d6645) to head (20ca1e0).
Report is 167 commits behind head on 3.3.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...apache/dubbo/tracing/DubboObservationRegistry.java 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...apache/dubbo/tracing/metrics/ObservationMeter.java 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                3.3   #14986      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     60.75%   60.74%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    10864    10867       +3     
============================================
  Files          1882     1883       +1     
  Lines         86009    86009              
  Branches      12887    12887              
============================================
- Hits          52251    52247       -4     
- Misses        28313    28318       +5     
+ Partials       5445     5444       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration-tests 33.05% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
samples-tests 29.22% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit-tests 58.89% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@songxiaosheng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Please fix style check

fixed

@AlbumenJ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

AlbumenJ commented Feb 8, 2025

Can this PR fix that issue?

@songxiaosheng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Can this PR fix that issue?

yes,we can lazy load micrometer class when it exists:
image

@AlbumenJ AlbumenJ merged commit da3ed53 into apache:3.3 Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants