Skip to content

[test](regression) Avoid selecting raw bitmap column in Arrow Flight suite - #62536

Closed
hakanuzum wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
hakanuzum:test/regression-bitmap-arrowflight
Closed

[test](regression) Avoid selecting raw bitmap column in Arrow Flight suite#62536
hakanuzum wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
hakanuzum:test/regression-bitmap-arrowflight

Conversation

@hakanuzum

@hakanuzum hakanuzum commented Apr 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number:

Related PR: #62410

Problem Summary: The suite selected raw BITMAP (VARBINARY) output via "select *" and compared unstable driver-dependent bytes. Restrict queries to stable "bitmap_to_string" output and update expected results.

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test: No need to test (CI regression)
  • Behavior changed: No
  • Does this need documentation: No

@hakanuzum
[test](regression) Avoid selecting raw bitmap column
3619f2d 
### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number:

Related PR:

Problem Summary: Regression case selected raw BITMAP/VARBINARY column and compared unstable/driver-dependent bytes; compare only bitmap_to_string output instead.

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test: No need to test (CI regression will cover)
- Behavior changed: No
- Does this need documentation: No
@hello-stephen

hello-stephen commented Apr 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hakanuzum hakanuzum mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2026
Closed
3 tasks done
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Apr 16, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@velodb-robyang

velodb-robyang commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

run buildall

1 similar comment
@yiguolei

yiguolei commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hakanuzum
[chore](build) Retrigger CI
0309fd0 
### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number:

Related PR: apache#62536

Problem Summary: Empty commit to retrigger GitHub Actions so License Check uses the updated workflow merged in apache#62534.

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test: No need to test (CI)
- Behavior changed: No
- Does this need documentation: No
@yiguolei

yiguolei commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hakanuzum

hakanuzum commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/review

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode automated review failed and did not complete.

Error: Review step was failure (possibly timeout or cancelled)
Workflow run: https://github.com/apache/doris/actions/runs/24881801202

Please inspect the workflow logs and rerun the review after the underlying issue is resolved.

@morningman morningman mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Open
30 of 65 tasks
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while.
This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you'd like to revive this PR, please reopen it and feel free a maintainer to remove the Stale tag!

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale label Oct 22, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Nov 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguolei yiguolei yiguolei approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed Stale

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hakanuzum @hello-stephen @velodb-robyang @yiguolei