Skip to content

branch-3.1: [opt](iceberg)support read iceberg with tag/branch #51272 - #52740

Merged
morrySnow merged 1 commit into
apache:branch-3.1from
morningman:31_bp51272
Jul 4, 2025
Merged

morrySnow merged 1 commit into
apache:branch-3.1from
morningman:31_bp51272

Conversation

@morningman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bp #51272

@morningman
morningman requested a review from morrySnow as a code owner July 3, 2025 13:39
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

Related Issue: apache#48285

Problem Summary:

if an iceberg has a branch named `branch1` and a tag named `tag1`, you
can query `branch1` or `tag1` by these ways:
```sql
-- query 'branch1'
select * from tb FOR VERSION AS OF 'branch1';
select * from tb@branch(branch1);
select * from tb@branch('name'='branch1')

-- query 'tag1'
select * from tb FOR VERSION AS OF 'tag1';
select * from tb@tag(tag1);
select * from tb@tag('name'='tag1')

```
@morningman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

run buildall

@morrySnow morrySnow changed the title [opt](iceberg)support read iceberg with tag/branch (#51272) branch-3.1: [opt](iceberg)support read iceberg with tag/branch #51272 Jul 4, 2025
@morrySnow
morrySnow merged commit 24f4cf2 into apache:branch-3.1 Jul 4, 2025
etah000 pushed a commit to etah000/doris that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants