Skip to content

Conversation

@SbloodyS
Copy link
Member

@SbloodyS SbloodyS commented Jul 25, 2024

Purpose of the pull request

Brief change log

Verify this pull request

This pull request is code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This pull request is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(or)

Pull Request Notice

Pull Request Notice

If your pull request contain incompatible change, you should also add it to docs/docs/en/guide/upgrede/incompatible.md

@github-actions github-actions bot added UI ui and front end related backend test labels Jul 25, 2024
@SbloodyS SbloodyS added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Jul 25, 2024
@SbloodyS SbloodyS added the DSIP label Jul 25, 2024
@caishunfeng
Copy link
Contributor

The pr #14981 add the alert event listener, I think it's not same with audit log.

This pr seems to revert it, right? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Can add some brief change log pr description?

@SbloodyS
Copy link
Member Author

The pr #14981 add the alert event listener, I think it's not same with audit log.

This pr seems to revert it, right? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Can add some brief change log pr description?

Yes. I've discuss it with @ruanwenjun . Since the current workflow state is refactored in #16327, will add a new workflow state listener after it's merged.

@SbloodyS SbloodyS changed the title [DSIP-57][Audit] Refactor PR 14981 code [DSIP-57][Audit] Revert PR 14981 code Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@caishunfeng caishunfeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall

Copy link
Member

@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to revert some doc? I am not sure.

@SbloodyS
Copy link
Member Author

Do we need to revert some doc? I am not sure.

So far I have not found the relevant document...

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
23.5% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@SbloodyS SbloodyS merged commit d9244ca into apache:dev Jul 26, 2024
@SbloodyS SbloodyS deleted the dsip_57 branch July 26, 2024 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backend DSIP test UI ui and front end related

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants