@ruanwenjun @zhuangchong PTAL

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (3.0.6-prepare@565bc97). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 5f05871 differs from pull request most recent head d416417. Consider uploading reports for the commit d416417 to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             3.0.6-prepare   #14087   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   40.32%           
  Complexity               ?     4642           
================================================
  Files                    ?      889           
  Lines                    ?    35252           
  Branches                 ?     3901           
================================================
  Hits                     ?    14214           
  Misses                   ?    19654           
  Partials                 ?     1384           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

does it exists in dev branch?

does it exists in dev branch?

As far as I know, first of all, the latest code branch structure has changed, and it does not judge whether the sub-process instance is finished before stopping the task in the parent workflow

BTW ，I think we should stop the remote execution of the task first. Then judge the status of the remote task, and finally update the task status in the parent process WDYT@zhongjiajie @ruanwenjun

killRemoteSubprocessInstanc()
if(subprocessInstance.getState.typeisFinish){
currentTask.setState(subprocessInstance.getState)
updateCurrentTaskById
}

或者我们在调用远程任务有返回信息之后，再根据subprocessinstance 的状态来判断是否更新父流程中的task状态
Or we can judge whether to update the task state in the parent process according to the state of the subprocess instance after calling the remote task and returning information

@zhuangchong @zhongjiajie PTAL

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

25 Bugs
14 Vulnerabilities
4 Security Hotspots
804 Code Smells

35.5% Coverage
5.8% Duplication

@fuchanghai BTW, next time you can use close #14086to let pr close references issue when pr merged

@fuchanghai BTW, next time you can use close #14086to let pr close references issue when pr merged

thanks for your reminder